Otorank covers one thing and covers it in order, without asking you to brief or arbitrate each step: research, a 30-day editorial calendar, articles written, published, linked internally and submitted for indexing, 30 a month. This is not a product against a product, it is a subscription against a profession, and the two do not cover the same work. An agency sells strategy, technical expertise, negotiation and accountability, with content as one line among several. The useful question is not which is better, it is which parts of your retainer are the reason you hired them.
A retainer that mostly buys published articles is exactly what Otorank replaces: the chain runs in order without a brief from you, research through to indexing, 30 articles a month. Technical work, market strategy and accountability stay with an agency, and the editorial volume runs on the subscription.
One is a production line, the other is a team. Most of the businesses reading this need parts of both.
Otorank studies your business and market, builds the SEO strategy, then writes, publishes and links the content every month. It is an execution platform: you connect your site once and the articles, internal links and indexing keep going without you. A dedicated backlinks offer completes this when you want to strengthen authority.
An SEO agency sells judgement and execution together: a strategy built around your business, keyword and market research, content production, technical work on the site itself, negotiated link acquisition, monthly reporting and an account manager who answers when something goes wrong.
A monthly agency retainer typically covers seven things. Otorank covers two of them. This is a breakdown, not a verdict.
Research is included and becomes a 30-day editorial calendar you approve. Strategy is not: Otorank does not decide what your business should bet on.
Both, and the strategy is built around your market, your margins and your competitors, which is the part a tool genuinely cannot do.
Otorank covers the research half. The judgement half stays with them, or with you.
30 articles researched, written, published and internally linked every month, at a fixed price.
Included, usually as one line item among several, and typically the most heavily billed part of the retainer because it is the most labour-intensive.
This is the line where the two overlap most, and the only one where a subscription changes the arithmetic.
Not offered. Otorank does not audit or fix a site, and no one here answers for your rankings.
Technical work on the site, monthly reporting, and a named person who responds when results stall.
Three things you cannot buy as a subscription, and the most common reason to keep an agency.
Otorank runs each campaign to a known volume at a known price. Both approaches work, and agency outreach can reach placements Otorank cannot.
What a subscription offers is a known volume at a known price, with a report at the end of each campaign. Agency link building can reach placements Otorank cannot, and this page will not pretend otherwise.
The same 11 base rows as every other Otorank comparison page, plus three rows this comparison needs. Several rows read "varies by agency" because a service has no single answer, and six of them go to the agency.
Included · Partial · Not included · Paid add-on
Agency pricing varies enormously by country, market and scope. Figures here are broad ranges, not quotes, and no row should be read as a market rate. Compare against your own proposal rather than these numbers.
There are many cases where an agency is enough. Here they are, and when that changes.
An agency is the right choice when the retainer buys judgement. Strategy, technical work on the site, negotiation and someone answerable for results are all outside what Otorank sells, and a regulated or highly specific market needs a human deciding what to bet on. Otorank is the right buy for the editorial volume itself: research, 30 published articles a month, internal linking, indexing, audited link campaigns and an SEO team seven days a week, at subscription price. Most businesses reading this need parts of both.
The strategy was set two years ago and most of the monthly work is producing content.
Crawl issues, a migration ahead, or a structure that needs rebuilding.
Sector rules, legal review, or a niche where generic content fails.
It's not the total budget that matters, it's the share that goes to content. If your retainer mostly buys published articles, Otorank changes the arithmetic: 30 articles created, published and indexed a month at a fixed price. If content is only a quarter of the retainer, the rest buys things Otorank doesn't sell: strategy, technical work, accountability.
Yes, and it's the most common case. Otorank handles the editorial volume, 30 articles published and indexed every month, with a dedicated backlinks offer, at a fixed price. The agency keeps bespoke strategy, technical SEO, negotiation and accountability for results. The two complement each other.
Ask what share of the retainer is content production versus strategy, technical work and reporting. If content dominates, Otorank covers that line predictably; if it's a minority, the agency mostly buys judgement, which Otorank does not replace.
Otorank doesn't decide strategy: it produces and publishes against a calendar you approve. The choice of what to bet on, sector expertise and accountability for results stay with you or your agency. Otorank runs the volume, not the judgement.
No. It replaces the "content production" line of a retainer, not the strategy, technical work or accountability. Many keep an agency for judgement and add Otorank for published volume.
The editorial volume executed every month: research, 30 published articles, internal linking, indexing and audited link campaigns. Cancel anytime.